Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  9 / 20 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

MODE OF ACTION

JCN supplement

2015,Vol 29, No 5

9

with lower extremity chronic wounds.

The portable mechanically-powered

system was used in conjunction with

a gauze wound filler, while the larger

system used foam, although pressure

levels were applied equally in both

groups. Over a 16-week study period

there was no significant difference in

wound closure outcomes between the

devices (Armstrong et al, 2012).

Similarly, Hurd et al (2014)

recently published a non-comparative

evaluation of 326 patients treated

with another portable NPWT system

(PICO

; Smith & Nephew) for an

eight-week period in a community

setting in Canada. The majority of

patients (68%) achieved complete

wound closure within eight weeks.

When compared to records of

patients in their practice previously

treated with conventional NPWT

systems, the researchers found

equivalent healing outcomes, with a

77% reduction

in wound area in the

portable system compared to 70%

with conventional NPWT over eight

weeks (Hurd et al, 2014).

CONCLUSION

Over the past 20 years, NPWT has

become widely accepted by clinicians

as an efficient treatment for many

different wound types. Research has

shown that for patients living with

chronic wounds the technique helps

to reduce the impact of problems such

as exudate leakage, soiling of clothes

or bedding, and wound odour. From

the clinician’s point of view, NPWT

results in fewer dressing changes due

to its ability to manage exudate, and

the benefits to the wound itself —

including rapid wound contraction,

removal of sloughy material,

appearance of granulation tissue and

overall reduction in wound volume —

are often apparent within days

of application.

As the adoption of single-use

portable NPWT systems becomes

more widespread in a variety of

wound indications and patient

settings, the growing body of evidence

suggests that portable NPWT units

will be able to replicate the clinical

outcomes of larger systems, but with

the additional benefits of simplicity

and affordability.

JCN

REFERENCES

Armstrong DG, Marston WA, Reyzelman

AM, Kirsner RS (2012) Comparative

effectiveness of mechanically and

electrically powered negative pressure

wound therapy devices: a multicenter

randomized controlled trial.

Wound Rep

Regen

20(3):

332–41

Bondokji S, Rangaswamy M, Reuter C,

et al (2011) Clinical efficacy of a new

variant of a foam-based NWPT system.

J Wound Care

20(2):

62–7

Campbell PE, Smith GS, Smith JM (2008)

Retrospective clinical evaluation of

gauze-based negative pressure wound

therapy.

Int Wound J

5(2):

280–6

Dorafshar AH, Franczyk M, Gottlieb LJ,

Wroblewski KE, Lohman RF (2012) A

prospective randomized trial comparing

subatmospheric wound therapy with a

sealed gauze dressing and the standard

vacuum-assisted closure device.

Ann

Plast Surg

69(1):

79–84

Fraccalvieri M, Scalise A, Ruka E, et

al (2014) Negative pressure wound

therapy using gauze and foam:

histological, immunohistochemical, and

ultrasonography morphological analysis

of granulation and scar tissues.

Eur J

Plast Surg

37(8):

411–16

Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A (2014)

Use of a portable, single-use negative

pressure wound therapy device in home

care patients with low to moderately

exuding wounds: a case series.

Ostomy

wound Manag

60(3):

30–6

Jones J E, Robinson J, Barr W (2008)

Impact of exudate and odour from

chronic venous ulceration.

Nurs

Standard

22(45):

53–4, 56, 58

Kilpadi DV, CunninghamMR (2011)

Evaluation of closed incision

management with negative pressure

wound therapy (CIM): hematoma/

seroma and involvement of the lymphatic

system.

Wound Rep Regen

19(5):

588–96

Malmsjö M, Gustafsson L, Lindstedt S,

Gesslein B, Ingemansson R (2012)

The effects of variable, intermittent,

and continuous negative pressure

wound therapy, using foam or gauze,

on wound contraction, granulation

tissue formation, and ingrowth into the

wound filler.

Eplasty

12:

e5

Malmsjö M, Huddleston E, Martin R

(2014) Biological effects of a disposable,

canisterless negative pressure wound

therapy system.

Eplasty

14:

e15

Malsiner CC, Schmitz M, Horch RE,

Keller AK, Leffler M (2013)Vessel

transformation in chronic wounds

under topical negative pressure therapy:

an immunohistochemical analysis.

Int Wound J.

Available online: http://

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/

iwj.12143/abstract (accessed 23 June,

2015)

Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-

Brown EI, McGuirt W (1997)Vacuum-

assisted closure: a new method for

wound control and treatment: animal

studies and basic foundation.

Ann Plast

Surg

38(6):

553–62

Mouës CM,Van Toorenenbergen AW,

Heule F, Hop WC, Hovius SER (2008)

The role of topical negative pressure

in wound repair: expression of

biochemical markers in wound fluid

during wound healing.

Wound Repair

Regen

16(4):

488–94

Rahmanian-Schwarz A, Willkomm L-M,

Gonser P, Hirt B, Schaller H-E (2012)

A novel option in negative pressure

wound therapy (NPWT) for chronic and

acute wound care.

Burns

38(4):

573–7

SaxenaV, Hwang C-W, Huang S,

Eichbaum Q, Ingber D, Orgill DP

(2004)Vacuum-assisted closure:

microdeformations of wounds and cell

proliferation.

Plast Reconstr Surg

114(5):

1086–96; discussion 1097–8

Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, FalangaV, et

al (2003) Wound bed preparation:

a systematic approach to wound

management.

Wound Repair Regen

March 11(Suppl):

S1–28

Stechmiller JK, Kilpadi DV, Childress B,

Schultz GS (2006) Effect of vacuum-

assisted closure therapy on the

expression of cytokines and proteases

in wound fluid of adults with pressure

ulcers.

Wound Repair Regen

14(3):

371–4

Wackenfors A, Sjögren J, Gustafsson R,

Algotsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö

M (2004) Effects of vacuum-assisted

closure therapy on inguinal wound

edge microvascular blood flow.

Wound

Rep Regen

12(6):

600–6

Wilkes R, ZhaoY, Cunningham K,

Kieswetter K, Haridas B (2009) 3D

strain measurement in soft tissue:

demonstration of a novel inverse finite

element model algorithm on MicroCT

images of a tissue phantom exposed

to negative pressure wound therapy.

J

Mech Behav Biomed Mater

2(3):

272–87

World Union of Wound Healing Societies

(WUWHS) (2007)

Principles of best

practice: wound exudate and the role

of dressings

. A consensus document.

London: MEP Ltd