Previous Page  7 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

JCN supplement

2018,Vol 32, No 4

7

HOLISTIC ASSESSMENT

should be treated immediately with

light Class 1 compression of up to

17mmHg to prevent deterioration

(Wounds UK, 2015; 2016). If the

wound subsequently fails to heal

within two weeks, they should

undergo full holistic assessment,

including vascular examination

(Wounds UK, 2016).

Local service provision and

patient pathways need to be

introduced to follow guidance. The

time needed to complete traditional

ABPI assessment, including the

20-minute resting period, is often

seen as a barrier for its completion to

community nurses faced with high

caseloads and low staff numbers

(Kirby and Hurst, 2014).

It is well known that completion

of traditional ABPI assessment

requires meticulous attention to

ensure that current measurement

values are obtained (Vowden and

Vowden, 2001). As with any other

skill, if this is not routinely practised,

inaccuracies may occur. Also, in the

author’s clinical opinion, there are

many areas where mistakes which

can lead to errors in ABPI readings

can be made; such as incorrect cuff

placement, true systolic pressures

being missed when listening for

returning sounds, using an incorrect

probe or cuff size, or repeatedly

inflating the cuff. Furthermore,

difficulties can occur in patients

presenting with chronic or severe

oedema or tissue fibrosis (Guest

et al, 2015). The calculation of the

pressures themselves to obtain the

ABPI ratio figure is another area

where inaccuracies can occur.

A less time-consuming method

of taking ABPI measurements has

been suggested as a way of helping

clinicians to better manage their time

(Yap Kannan et al, 2016). Furthermore,

developments in science and

technology in health care have been

encouraged in the‘Five year forward

view’(NHS England, 2014), such as

new technology in ABPI assessment,

which offers prompt, accessible

vascular screening, for example, MESI

ABPI MD (Freeman, 2017).

This system was developed

using improved oscillometric

plethysmography technology, which

offers a fast, simple and accurate

solution for the measurement of ABPI

in clinical practice. By utilising three

colour-coded blood pressure cuffs to

either arm and to each ankle, with

the simple push of a button, ABPI

can be measured and calculated in

one minute. The results of the left

and right ABPI are displayed on the

screen with a colour-coded alert to

the presence and level of arterial

disease, as suggested by TASC II

guidelines (Norgren et al, 2007).

This device also provides a visual

image of the pulse wave detected,

which provides further diagnostic

information regarding vascular

status that can be used alongside

holistic assessment. With no need for

lengthy rest periods, mathematical

calculations, subjective listening

skills, or difficult competencies to

learn and maintain, it offers clinicians

working in community settings an

alternative to traditional methods of

obtaining ABPI, particularly where

time pressures may result in absence

of full vascular assessment.

Evidence has shown comparable

results to the handheld doppler

method, and that it offers

comprehensive detection of critical

limb ischaemia (Span et al, 2016). As

MESI ABPI MD is lightweight and

portable, it can be used in a variety of

care settings, such as patients’homes,

community clinics and Leg Clubs.

Staines (2018) identified that nurses,

when asked, stated that they would

use MESI ABPI MD in practice, rather

than the traditional doppler method,

to provide efficient assessment

(

Figure 1

).

For some patients, there may

be difficulties in obtaining accurate

ABPI readings, e.g. those presenting

with chronic or severe oedema or

tissue fibrosis (Guest et al, 2015),

or other medical conditions. If

clinically indicated, patients should

be referred for further assessment or

specialist review.

REASSESSMENT AND WELL LEG/

REDUCTION OF RECURRENCE

Despite successful healing, this is

not the end of the patient journey

and care for those with venous leg

ulceration. With the risk of recurrence

within the next 12 months estimated

to be as high as 26–69% (Harding

et al, 2015), patients need to receive

ongoing maintenance treatment

(Wounds UK, 2016). Maintenance

therapy and monitoring should be

incorporated as a key part of any leg

ulcer care pathway so that patients

can receive ongoing care and advice.

Patient education and

involvement from the onset of care

can help to improve concordance

with self-care both during the healing

and maintenance phases (Jin et al,

2008). Patients need to understand

Practice point

Tools commonly used for lower limb vascular assessment, include:

Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): bedside test to exclude significant

arterial disease by comparing systolic blood pressure at the ankle and arm

Toe brachial pressure index (TBI): similar to ABPI but the cuff is placed on

the hallux for a toe pressure

Pulse oximetry: a secondary diagnostic tool to measure levels of oxygen in

the blood, although not reliable at excluding peripheral vascular disease

Arterial duplex scan: non-invasive ultrasound scan of the arteries; used to

provide visual assessment of vessels.

Practice point

In venous leg ulcer management,

lack of diagnosis and documented

assessment can impact on effective

care management and wound

healing. With venous leg ulcers

accounting for 40–85% of leg ulcers

(Harding et al, 2015), it is essential

to ensure that holistic assessment is

completed to optimise care.