Previous Page  49 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

WOUND CARE TODAY

2017,Vol 4, No 1

49

FOCUS ON

TIMES

i

MANAGEMENT

DVT is an identified risk factor for the

development of venous disease and,

in Ian’s case, this had happened. His

failing venous system had resulted

in skin breakdown, oedema and

hyperkeratosis, all of which could be

managed using compression therapy.

However, despite the application

of compression bandaging, the

wound had deteriorated, indicating

a possible problem with wound and

skin infection. Referral was made to a

dermatologist who prescribed a

course of prophylactic antibiotics,

which were to be taken over a

four-month period. The wound

began to improve and the oedema

reduced, aided by the combination of

bandaging and antibiotics.

By May 2015, Ian’s ulcer had

significantly improved and reduced in

size (

Figure 2).

The oedema, exudate

volume and pain had all reduced. He

and his wife were planning a holiday,

but he was concerned about how

his compression bandaging could be

reapplied safely and effectively

while away.

A hosiery kit was recommended

following discussion with Ian.

According to Ashby et al (2014),

compression hosiery kits can be

used as a first-line approach forVLU

management and may aid patient

self-care.

As Ian’s limb was oedematous,

ActiLymph

TM

(L&R) hosiery kit

was prescribed.

Ian reported feeling relieved

when trying the kit on that he could

severe oedema and skin breakdown.

Following discharge from hospital,

the ulcer was managed by the local

general practice nurse using wound

dressings and analgesia.

After three months the wound

was deteriorating and the limb

remained oedematous, so referral to

the local leg ulcer specialist service

was made and compression therapy

started. The ulcer was producing

a large volume of exudate and

dressings were required so bandaging

was selected.

Ian recalled being daunted at

first, but eventually got used to

the bandages, resigning himself to

the fact that they were a ‘necessary

evil’. However, despite the use of

compression bandaging, the wound

continued to progress slowly, largely

due to ongoing issues with infection.

Suddenly, in January 2015 the wound

deteriorated significantly (

Figure 1

).

Wound assessment

The findings of wound and skin

assessment are presented in

Figure 1

.

Leg assessment

Ian’s limb was oedematous, which

would precipitate a change in his gait,

ability to mobilise and reduce the

effectiveness of the calf muscle pump,

and Doppler ultrasound to determine

his ankle brachial pressure index

(ABPI) revealed a reading within the

normal range of 0.8–1.3, making him

eligible for full compression.

The wound bed was covered with yellow slough, which

provides an ideal environment for bacterial growth and thus

should be debrided.

The wound’s appearance indicated that biofilm may be

present, and be a possible cause for the deterioration/delayed

healing of the wound.

The wound was producing a large volume of exudate, putting

Ian at increased risk of wound and skin breakdown.

The edge of the wound was typical for a venous ulcer, being

shallow and irregular in shape.

Some hyperkeratotic plaques were present secondary to

underlying oedema.

Figure 2.

Ian’s ulcer improved following compression bandaging and antibiotics.

Figure 1.

Findings of wound and skin assessment using the principles of TIMES.

T

I

M

E

S

Ian’s leg ulcer at presentation.