Previous Page  27 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

WOUND CARE TODAY

2017,Vol 4, No 1

27

FOCUS ON

I

NFECTION

i

WCT

CONCLUSION

Wound infection can pose

a significant challenge to

healthcare professionals. If treated

inappropriately, it can lead to

increased costs and poor patient

outcomes. Using a structured

systematic approach to wound

assessment can help to ensure that

wound infection is diagnosed and

treated effectively within a timely

manner. Alongside this, robust

documentation will guide clinical

decision-making to provide effective

and efficient wound care.

REFERENCES

Angel D, Lloyd, P Carville K, Santamaria

N (2011) The clinical efficacy of two

semi-quantitative wound-swabbing

techniques in identifying the causative

organisms in infected cutaneous

wounds.

Int Wound J

176–83

Atiyeh B, Costaliola M, Hayek S, Dibo S

(2009) Effect of silver on burn wound

infection control and healing: review

of the literature.

Burns

139–48

Atkin L (2014) Understanding methods

of wound debridement.

Br J Nurs

6XSSO

S10–15

Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen

PØ, et al (2008) Why chronic wounds

will not heal: a novel hypothesis,

Wound Repair Regen

2–10

Cutting K, McGuire J (2015) Safe

bioburden management. A clinical

review of DACC technology.

J Wound

Care

S1–30

Department of Health (2010)

Using

the Commissioning for Quality and

Innovation (CQUIN) payment framework

– a summary guide

. DH, London

Dowsett C, Protz K, Drouard M,

Harding KG (2017)

Triangle of Wound

Assessment Made Easy

. Wounds

International. Available online:

www. woundsinternatinal.com

Dowsett C (2009) Use of TIME to improve

community nurses’wound care

knowledge and practice.

Wounds UK

14–21

Dowsett C, Newton H (2005) Wound bed

preparation: TIME in practice.

Wounds

UK

58–70

European Wound Management

Association (2005) Position document.

Identifying criteria for wound infection

.

MEP Ltd, London

Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Bjansholt T

et al (2013) EWMA document:

Antimicrobials and non-healing

wounds. Evidence, controversies and

suggestions.

J Wound Care

6XSSO

S1–S92

Guest J, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, et al

(2015) Health economic burden that

wounds impose on the National Health

Service in the UK.

BMJ Open

. Available

online:

http://bmjopen.bmj.com/

content/5/12/e009283

Harding K, Gray D, Timmons J, Hurd

T (2007) Evolution or revolution?

Adapting to complexity in wound

management.

Int Wound J

6XSS

1–12

International Wound Infection Institute

(IWII) (2016)

Wound infection in

Table 3:

Types of debridement within the community setting

Types of debridement

Advantages and disadvantages

Sharp/surgical debridement

i

Risk of bleeding

i

Requires very skilled healthcare professional

i

Painful for the patient

Mechanical debridement with monofilament pad

or cloth

i

Easy to use

i

May be painful for the patient

i

May depend on formulary availability

Larvae

i

Requires training

i

Patients may not like this method

i

Can be expensive

i

Caution is needed if the patient is on warfarin

Use of cleansing surfactants, e.g. Prontosan

®

solution

(B Braun), octenidine

®

(Schülke)

i

Easy to use in practice

i

Will depend on formulary availability

Top tip:

If topical antimicrobials are

used, the wound should be

reassessed after two weeks. If

no improvement, reconsider

antimicrobial as an alternative

product or antibiotic therapy

may be needed. If infection

unresolving, consider referral to

specialist service.

clinical practice

. Wounds International,

London. Available online:

www. woundsinternational.com/con sensus- documents/view/iwii-wound-infection- in-clinical-practice

Menke N, Ward K, Witten T, Bonchev D,

Diegelmann R (2007) Impaired wound

healing.

Clin Dermatol

19–25

Percival S, Cutting K (2011)

Microbiology

of Wounds

. CRC Press, London

Phillips C, Humphreys I, Fletcher J,

Harding K, Chamberlain G, Macey M

(2015) Estimating the costs associated

with the management of patients with

chronic wounds using linked routine

data.

Int Wound J

1193–97

Phillips P, Wolcott R, Fletcher J, Schultz G

(2010) Biofims made easy.

Wounds Int

. Available online:

www.wounds

international.com

Scott-Thomas J, Hayes C, Ling J, et al

(2017) A practical guide to systematic

wound assessment to meet the 2017–19

CQUIN target.

J Community Nurs

30–4

Totty JP, Smith GE, Carradice D, et al

(2017) Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride

(DACC)-coated dressings in the

management and prevention of wound

infection: a systematic review.

J Wound

Care

107–14

Warriner R, Burrell R (2005) Infection and

the chronic wound: a focus on silver.

Adv Skin Wound Care

6XS

2–12

Wounds UK (2010)

Best Practice

Statement :The use of topical antiseptics/

antimicrobials agents in wound

management

. Wounds UK, Aberdeen

Wounds UK (2017)

Best Practice Statement:

Making day-to-day management of

biofilm simple

. Wounds UK, London.

Available online:

www.wounds-uk.com

(accessed 10 October, 2017)