Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

JCN

Supplement 2016

23

LEG ULCER RECURRENCE

regimen. After the demonstration,

Amy decided that she was happy to

try juxtafit.

The juxtafit is a stronger device

than the juxtalite (see‘Science’box

for a full explanation of the different

juxta products), and is designed

for patients with chronic oedema

and lymphoedema. Amy felt that

the device was aesthetically more

acceptable than bandages

or hosiery.

Amy’s latest incidence of recurrent

ulceration healed using the juxtalite

system and she switched to the

juxtalite permanently to prevent

further recurrence of venous leg ulcers.

She was extremely impressed with

the outcome of the treatment and at

the time of writing remains self-caring

and healed.

EVIDENCE

Elvin (2015) showed that converting

patients to juxta products resulted in

improved quality of life scores when

judged against the compression

techniques used previously. Elvin

(2015) stated that additional benefits to

using juxta products include:

Improved clinical and personal

outcomes for patients

Improved quality of life scores using

a visual analogue scale (VAS), with

1 equalling‘very unhappy’, and

5 indicating‘very happy’. Of the

patients surveyed, 74% scored the

maximum score of 5, indicating that

they were very happy with

the product

Instant return to conventional

footwear for patients

Improved ability to self-care.

CONCLUSION

When a venous leg ulcer has healed

it is important to maintain a level of

compression to prevent recurrence.

This is a challenge for the patient and

nurse and in some cases leads to

long-term bandaging as the only

possible solution.

However, the recent introduction

of wraparound devices that include a

system for measuring the compression

applied has resulted in an effective

alternative for preventing recurrence.

The benefits of these systems

is clearly demonstrated in the case

studies above, where adoption of these

new devices led to improved quality

of life for patients who had become

disillusioned with conventional

compression therapy. Cost and time

savings were also achieved (National

Institute for Health and Care Excellence

[NICE], 2015; Wicks, 2015).

Listening to patients and trying to

understand the issues they face with

compression garments are important

factors to consider to ensure that

patient concordance is achieved. In the

case studies featured here, the juxta

devices offered solutions that were

safe and easy for patients to use and

thereby encouraged concordance with

compression therapy.

JCN

To cite this article:

Mahoney K (2016) A

simple and effective solution to preventing

recurrent venous leg ulcers.

J Community Nurs

30(4):

24–8

REFERENCES

Anderson I (2012) Encouraging compliance

and concordance in leg ulcer patients .

Wounds UK

8(1 Suppl):

S6–8

Elvin S (2015) Implementing change using

innovation to improve the patient

experience. Poster presentation at Queen's

Nursing Institute annual conference,

London

Damstra RJ, Partsch H (2013) Prospective,

randomised, control trial comparing

the effectiveness of adjustable

compressionVelcro wraps versus inelastic

multicomponent compression bandages in

the initial treatment of leg lymphoedema.

J

Vasc SurgVenous Lymphat Disord

1(1):

13–9

Gray D (2013) Achieving compression therapy

concordance in the new NHS: A challenge

for clinicians.

J Comm Nurs

27(4):

107–10

Harding K and the Expert Working

Group (2015) Simplifying venous

leg ulcer management. Consensus

document. Available online: www.

woundsinternational.com (accessed 12

July, 2016)

Lawrence G (2014) JuxtaCURES: an innovative

method of providing compression for leg

ulcer management.

Wounds UK

10(1):

64–70

Mosti G, Cavezzi A, Partsch H, Urson S,

Campana F (2015) AdjustableVelcro

compression devices are more effective

than inelastic bandages in reducing venous

edema in the initial treatment phase: a

randomized controlled trial.

Eur JVasc

Endovasc Surg

50(3):

368–74

Moffatt C, Kommala D, Dourdin N, et al (2009)

Venous leg ulcers: patient concordance

with compression therapy and its impact

on healing and prevention of recurrence.

Int Wound J

6(5):

386–93

NICE (2015) The juxtacures adjustable

compression system for treating venous leg

ulcers. Available online:

www.nice.org.uk/

advice/mib25 (accessed 8 July, 2016)

Nelson EA, Bell-Syer SEM (2014)Compression

for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers.

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

9:

CD002303

SIGN (2010)

Management of ChronicVenous Leg

Ulcers

. Clinical guideline 120. Available

online:

www.sign.ac.uk

(accessed 8 July,

2016)

Smith M (2016) Appropriate compression is

necessary to prevent recurrence in venous

leg ulceration. Ask the expert.

J General

Practice Nurs

2(4):

24–5

Wicks G (2015) An alternative to compression

bandaging in venous leg ulcers.

J Comm

Nurs

29(4):

40–6

KEY POINTS

When trying to prevent the

recurrence of leg ulcers, many

community nurses find it hard

to get patients to concord

with compression devices and

techniques, particularly over the

long term.

This article looks at a

new adjustableVelcro

compression device, juxtalite (part

of the juxta

range; medi UK),

which is designed to be simple

to apply.

The system has a built-in pressure

system that allows the nurse to

accurately monitor the level of

compression being applied to the

limb, ensuring a therapeutic level

of compression is maintained.

This article demonstrates a series

of case studies that show how

the system aids patient

concordance with treatment over

a period of time.