Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

JCN

Supplement 2016

17

COMPRESSION THERAPY

sessions including patient

selection, measuring, fitting and

troubleshooting. The tissue viability

team delivered these sessions with

support from a member of the medi

clinical team.

Nursing skills

The juxtacures product range is

a relatively new innovation and

the concept is very different to

traditional methods of managing

venous leg ulcers. The community

nurses had never used these devices

before and initially struggled to

change their practice, for instance

some would simply revert back to

using bandages if they encountered

any difficulties rather than

reviewing the new system. In the

first few days after application, the

devices often needed to be adjusted

to fit the changing limb size as the

patient’s oedema reduced.

This kind of resistance to change

is not uncommon, however, and

it was important to understand

the nurses’ anxieties and explain

how these could be resolved to

move forward with the project

(Wright, 2010).

Curtis and White (2002)

recommended that ownership

and inclusion are one of the best

methods to overcome resistance to

change and a solution was arrived

at whereby instead of the tissue

viability nurses in the complex

wound clinic measuring and fitting

the adjustable Velcro compression

devices initially, this task would

be given to the community nurses.

It was hoped that involving the

community nurses in the early

stages of the project would help

them recognise the need for change

and lead them to accept the project.

It was also decided to focus on one

community nursing team at a time

— once one team was familiar with

the techniques involved, the project

would move on to another team.

The tissue viability nurses were

charged with acting as change

agents and given the task of

guiding the community nursing

teams through the project, as well

as providing support and advice

(Jones, 2007). The tissue viability

service developed a more in-depth

training schedule and worked

alongside the medi clinical team

to train and support the nurses in

using the product range throughout

the project.

Launch

Once the project launched, the

community nurses were each

accompanied by a member of the

medi clinical team for their initial

visit to measure and fit the device,

as well as on their first follow-up

appointment. After these initial

appointments, the community

nurses continued to manage the

patients independently. During the

project, the nurses were asked to

collect simple information regarding

visit schedules (nurses collected data

on how often they visited patients,

how many times patients called

in for extra visits and how long

the face-to-face contact time was)

and patient comfort. This data was

collected on the initial visit, at week

four, and either upon discharge or

on completion of the treatment.

Patients were asked the following

comfort-related questions:

Whether the garment

was comfortable

Whether the device was

more comfortable than

previous systems

Whether the patient’s mobility

had improved.

Results

Of the 16 patients fitted with

juxtacures, only nine sets of data

were returned and available for

analysis. Two of the nine patients

were subsequently discharged from

the project and the district nursing

caseload completely, as they were

able to manage the adjustable Velcro

compression devices independently.

Before the project, these patients

had been unable to manage

compression hosiery to prevent

reccurrence of venous leg ulcers

and as a result had been managed

in bandages with weekly visits from

the community nursing team.

However, despite the limited

amount of data, the results that

were collected during the project

were very positive. Six of the

nine patients found the devices

comfortable and were keen to

continue with the treatment. Of

the remaining three patients, one

returned to using bandages as they

were not able to wash and care for

the adjustable Velcro compression

device when it became soiled, while

two others asked to be returned

to their previous regimens. One

of these was wearing compression

hosiery before using the adjustable

Velcro compression devices and was

able to manage this independently;

the second was a patient with

dorsum oedema who was unable

to adjust the device and had no

carer to assist and therefore did not

fit the inclusion criteria set out in

Table 1

. These patients should not

have been included in the project

from the beginning — the caseload

holders at the time were under

enormous pressure and at times

the inclusion criteria were not

strictly followed.

During the project there was an

overall reduction in nursing visits

by seven per week across all nine

patients. The average visit time

for a patient with an adjustable

Velcro compression device was

also reduced to 19 minutes from

the average of 40 minutes that

visits had previously taken with

bandages (as documented in

patients’ electronic medical records).

By converting even a small group of

patients from traditional bandaging

methods, an estimated four hours

and 40 minutes of nursing time was

saved per week.

Overall, with the assistance of

carers, patients were able to adjust

the devices independently and

remain in the devices for long-

term management.

DISCUSSION

Issues encountered

during the project

This project was set up to discover

if a therapeutic level of compression

could be applied accurately and

safely by a trained community nurse

using a new system of adjustable

Velcro compression devices. During

the project a number of obstacles

were identified. High workload

and reduced nursing staff meant