Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

DISCUSSION

i

use of nitric oxide monitoring (FeNO) — something I have

used in practice to enhance asthma diagnosis for eight years

and find very helpful. Poor prescribing will only be revealed

if we routinely interrogate our prescribing data —which can

be done with relative ease in general practice — and then act

either through education or patient reviews.

CS

I don’t believe any clinician wants to do a‘poor job’, but you

‘don’t know what you don’t know’, so obviously education

and training are key. The way to really raise the bar would

be to ensure all those involved in respiratory care meet a

standard competency level, but clinical practice changes

and we need to encourage individuals to keep up to date.

Not all nurses read scientific journals or are interested

in evidence-based practice, but we need to find ways of

bringing evidence to them in a variety of ways and make

sure we spend time implementing guideline-driven care.

Specifically with regard to diagnosis, good history

taking is vital, so having the time to undertake a structured

consultation is important. However, in many cases objective

tests are also necessary for a definitive diagnosis. Spirometry

is increasingly performed in primary care, but the results

and quality of the tests are variable and unless it is of the

correct standard then it will lead to misdiagnosis (Primary

Care Commissioning, 2013).The major professional societies

and educational organisations all advocate the development

of a recognised national register for those who undertake

spirometry and interpret the results.The inclusion of FeNO

in the BTS/SIGN (2014) guidelines should see the expansion

of near-patient testing in general practice, as well as the

increased use of blood eosinophils.

MF

WHAT IS THE VALUE OF SPECIALIST RESPIRATORY

NURSING? HOW IS THIS ROLE DEFINED AND HOW DO

YOU MEASURE/ASSESS ITS ‘VALUE’ OR ‘QUALITY’

Defining who is a specialist nurse can be controversial as

there is a lot of specialism in general practice with some

so-called‘general practice nurses’trained to a high level and

offering great care. However, the specialist nurse is generally

perceived as someone who sees patients with a specific

condition, e.g. respiratory disease.What is important is that

the majority of care will not involve the specialist team—

diagnosis is usually carried out in general practice, as is the

majority of ongoing management. It is only a very small

proportion of patients with asthma and very severe COPD,

or those at end of life, who may ever see a specialist. It is vital

that the practice team and the‘usual’nurse is well-trained

and clinically up to date, as it is these healthcare professionals

who will provide most of the care.

CS

The majority of‘airway’diseases —mainly asthma and

COPD— can and should be managed in primary care by

nurses interested in respiratory conditions. However, very few

of these would call themselves specialist respiratory nurses.

I believe there is a difference between generalist nurses who

have additional skills in particular disease areas and those

who are true specialists — it’s similar to a GP with an interest

in respiratory conditions and a respiratory consultant. In a

true integrated care model, the specialist nurse should be part

of the extended primary care team and be available for nurses

and GPs to access for advice on more complex patients.

For many years — and not only in respiratory care —

we have struggled to determine the true value of specialist

nurses.This is not because they are not respected for their

skills — numerous studies have demonstrated high patient

satisfaction. However, in the strictly budgeted NHS it is

important to demonstrate the economic value of our work,

which is defined as‘outcomes relative to costs’.This is a hard

task, but one that needs to be addressed, otherwise I fear we

could see the gradual decline of specialist nurses.

MF

IN THE FUTURE, WHAT ONE THING DO YOU THINK

SHOULD BE DONE TO ENSURE THAT PATIENTS WITH

RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS RECEIVE THE PATIENT-

CENTRED CARE THAT THEY NEED?

If there could be a minimum standard of care offered to

patients with respiratory conditions, it should be that each

practice has a named GP and nurse who are appropriately

trained, assessed, competent and feel confident to deal

with respiratory conditions commonly seen in primary

care, and that the whole practice team has a minimum

level of competence. To see a Quality Award in all practices

would be fantastic.

CS

Patient-centred care requires a change in attitudes and

we need to challenge our perceptions. The biggest issue is

the attitudes of nurses themselves. In 2011, Education for

Health undertook a study (Upton et al, 2011) on shared

decision making among practice nurses and found that it

was often used to support the nurse’s agenda rather than

as an expression of equality — nurses used it to try and

persuade patients to do what they wanted. If this is the

common understanding of patient-centred care, then we

still have quite a long way to go!

MF

REFERENCES

British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines

Network (2014) British guideline on the management of asthma.

Thorax

69

(Suppl)

: 1–192

NHS England (2014)

FiveYear Forward View

. NHS England,

London. Available online:

www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/

uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf

Primary Care Commissioning (2013)

Guide To Quality Assured

Diagnostic Spirometry

. Available online:

http://bit.ly/1IN08pD

Royal College of Physicians (2014)

Why asthma still kills: the

National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) Confidential Enquiry

report

. RCP, London

Upton J, Fletcher M, Madoc-Sutton H, et al (2011) Shared decision

making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative

study of primary care asthma nurses’views on sharing decisions

with patients regarding inhaler device selection.

Health

Expectations

14(4):

374–82

?

?

RESPIRATORY CARE TODAY

2015,Vol 1, No 1

11